Thursday 12 April 2018

paper:-8 assignment

To evaluate my Assignment Click here.



Name:-Nirali dungrani
SEM:-02
Roll no:-24
Year:-2017-2019
Enrollment no:-2069108420180012
Paper:-8(cultural studies)
Assignment topic:-Postmodernism in cultural studies.
Email id:-dungraninirali@gmail.com
Submitted:-S.B.Gardi Department of English




Introduction:-
Image result for postmodern literature
Ø Postmodernism is a reaction against modernism. The term postmodernism use   for cultural studies, rejects the opposition between high or elite cultural and   law or mass culture.
Ø Postmodernism, especially in term of its use for cultural studies, rejects the opposition between high or elite culture.
Ø Major figures of high modernism who radically redefined poetry and fiction included Virginia Woolf, James Joyce, Ezra Pound, T.S.Eliot, Wallace Stevens, Marcel Proust, Franz Kafka and William fallace.
Ø a late 20th-century style and concept in the arts, architecture, and criticism, which represents a departure from modernism and is characterized by the self-conscious use of earlier styles and conventions, a mixing of different artistic styles and media, and a general distrust of theories.
Ø Postmodernism is closely aligned with cultural studies, and its focus on the modes by which certain culture artefacts come to occupy higher status.
Ø Postmodernism borrows from modernism disillusionment with the givens of society; a penchant for irony; the self-conscious play either the work of art; fragmentation and ambiguity; and a destructured,decentered,dehumanized sub-ject.but while modernism presented a fragmented view of human history, this fragmentation was seen as a tragic.
Ø Postmodernism suggests the power relations structure all social truths, approaches and even conceptions of reality.
Ø Postmodernism prefers mini-narratives of local events.
Ø Postmodernism is best compared to the emergens of computer technology.

            

Characteristics of Postmodernism:-
When listing the characteristics of postmodernism, it is important to remember that postmodernists do not place their philosophy in a defined box or category. Their beliefs and practices are personal rather than being identifiable with a particular establishment or special interest group. The following principles appear elemental to postmodernists:
Ø There is no absolute truth - Postmodernists believe that the notion of truth is a contrived illusion, misused by people and special interest groups to gain power over others.
Ø Truth and error are synonymous - Facts, postmodernists claim, are too limiting to determine anything. Changing erratically, what is fact today can be false tomorrow.
Ø Self-conceptualization and rationalization - Traditional logic and objectivity are spurned by postmodernists. Preferring to rely on opinions rather than embrace facts, postmodernist spurn the scientific method.
Ø Traditional authority is false and corrupt - Postmodernists speak out against the constraints of religious morals and secular authority. They wage intellectual revolution to voice their concerns about traditional establishment.
Ø Ownership - They claim that collective ownership would most fairly administrate goods and services.
Ø Disillusionment with modernism - Postmodernists rue the unfulfilled promises of science, technology, government, and religion.
Ø Morality is personal - Believing ethics to be relative, postmodernists subject morality to personal opinion. They define morality as each person’s private code of ethics without the need to follow traditional values and rules.
Ø Globalization – Many postmodernists claim that national boundaries are a hindrance to human communication. Nationalism, they believe, causes wars. Therefore, postmodernists often propose internationalism and uniting separate countries.
Ø All religions are valid - Valuing inclusive faiths, postmodernists gravitate towards New Age religion. They denounce the exclusive claims of Jesus Christ as being the only way to God.
Ø Liberal ethics - Postmodernists defend the cause of feminists and homosexuals.
Ø Pro-environmentalism - Defending “Mother Earth,” postmodernists blame Western society for its destruction.

Post-modernism and Modernism
Ø Postmodernism was a reaction against modernism. Modernism was generally based on idealism and a utopian vision of human life and society and a belief in progress.
Ø  It assumed that certain ultimate universal principles or truths such as those formulated by religion or science could be used to understand or explain reality.
Ø  Modernist artists experimented with form, technique and processes rather than focusing on subjects, believing they could find a way of purely reflecting the modern world.
Ø While modernism was based on idealism and reason, postmodernism was born of scepticism and a suspicion of reason.
Ø It challenged the notion that there are universal certainties or truths.
Ø Postmodern art drew on philosophy of the mid to late twentieth century, and advocated that individual experience and interpretation of our experience was more concrete than abstract principles.
Ø While the modernists championed clarity and simplicity; postmodernism embraced complex and often contradictory layers of meaning.
Postmodernism – Right and Wrong?
Postmodernists do not attempt to refine their thoughts about what is right or wrong, true or false, good or evil. They believe that there isn’t such a thing as absolute truth. Postmodernist views the world outside of themselves as being in error, that is, other people’s truth becomes indistinguishable from error. Therefore, no one has the authority to define truth or impose upon others his idea of moral right and wrong.

Their self-rationalization of the universe and world around them pits themselves against divine revelation versus moral relativism. Many choose to believe in naturalism and evolution rather than God and creationism.


Postmodern art:-                      
Ø Postmodern art was late 20th century movement. It opposed the modernist preoccupation with purity of from and technique.
Ø Postmodernism is a body of art movements that sought to contradict some aspects of modernism or some aspects that emerged or developed in its aftermath.  
Ø Postmodern artists such as assemblage artist Robert Rauschenberg and sculptor Claes Oldenburg take a more skeptical view of artistic purity and seriousness.
Ø Modernist artists typically identify with the idea of "art for art's sake", value the individuality of the artist, and believe in technological and artistic progress. Art critic Clement Greenberg embodies this position in his claim that the goal of each art is to reveal the inherent properties of its medium.
Ø Postmodernists opened art to a wide variety of influences and sources of material from various places and time periods, also frequently seeking to identify and diminish hierarchies in the art world and society, such as in the Appropriationist works of Sherry Levine, or the political art of Barbara Kruger or Judy Chicago.    

 Difference between Modern Art and Postmodern Art

                   
           
1) Modern art believed in the theory of going deep into the subject. On the other hand. Postmodern art does not believe in the theory of going deep into the subject.
2) In modern art, you will see actual paintings. In postmodern art, you will see that creations include not only painting but sometimes texts. This is something you do not see in modern art.

3) Modern art believes in the individual, postmodern art believes that social context matters.


Subculture, popular culture and postmodernism:-

Ø The arrival of rock music, MTV, films such as Ridley scott's Blade Runner have created a whole postmodern popular culture.

Ø A good example of a postmodern art from that exhibits several of the concepts and themes discussed above is cyberpunk.

Ø Postmodernism in cultural studies celebrates the fragmented, the plural, the contingent and the local while rejecting universals and totalities. It sees representation as an end in itself calls into question the nation of TRUTH behind signs/words/images and collapses the distinction between original and copy.


   


  Jean-francois Lyotard and the postmodern condition:-

                         

Ø Lyotard introduced the term postmodernism which was previously only used by art critics, into philosophy and social sciences.

Ø Jean-Francois characterize the postmodern as a disbelife in and resistance to metanrratives.


Ø Postmodernism acknowledges that all knowledge is fragmentary, partial and incomplete. 

Ø He argues that stability is maintained through grand narratives or master narratives, stories a culture tells itself about its practices and beliefs in order to keep going.
                                                                                                    
Jane Baudrillard and the Hyperreal:         
Ø Baudrillard's central argumen is that in the age of perfect reproduction and andless repetition of images, the distinction between the real and the illusory, between original and copy, between superficiality and depth.
Ø For Baudrilladr,the postmodern is characterize by the hyoerreal and also by the collapse of distinction between the private and the public
Ø For him postmodernism marks a culture composed if disparate fragmentary experiences and images that constantly bombard the individual in music, video, television, advertising and other forms of electronic media.
Ø Postmodernism thus reflect both the energy and diversity of contemporary life as well as its frequent lack of coherence and depth.







Paul Virilio and Hypermodernism:-



Ø Virile argues that the histories of socio-political institutions such the military or even cultural movements demonstrate the need for speed rather than commerce.
Ø He argues that higher soeeds belong to the upper reaches so society and the slower ones to the bottom.
He suggests that hypermodern vision and the hypomodern city are both products of military power and time based cinematic technologies of disappearance.


Conclusion:-

Ø We can see that postmodernism has given us many idead which are important.
Ø Postmodernism rejects any totality-of knowledge, ideology or philosophy.
Ø Postmodernism demonstrates that when we try & reproduce objects as a percevible shape, it appears sadly lacking to us.
Ø It believes in the contingency of values and the very local nature of truth.
Ø It is present only in its absence; knowable only through its unrepresentability.
Ø Postmodernism art and culture deliberately evoke older forms to parody and subvert the hierarchy so mass culture.
Ø Baudrillard also values the postmodern principle of non-representation.
Ø It belives that with the adent of more technology and media, our lives are under constant surveillance.

Bibliography










 

paper:-7 assignment

To evaluate my Assignment Click here.



Name:-Nirali dungrani
SEM:-02
Roll no:-24
Year:-2017-2019
Enrollment no:-2069108420180012
Paper:-7(literary theory and criticism)
Assignment topic:-I.A.Richard’s figurative language.
 Email id:-dungraninirali@gmail.com
Submitted:-S.B.Gardi Department of English








Introduction:-

I.A. Richards (1893–1979)
                                        Image result for i a richards                             

British poet and scholar Ivor Armstrong Richards was born in Cheshire and educated at Cambridge University’s Magdalene College. His scholarship and research on how students read poetry helped shape the foundation of the New Criticism and its emphasis on close reading. With C.K. Ogden, Richards created the teaching tool Basic English, a simplified version of the English language that, in the interests of clear expression, limited both the number of words and the rules of their usage.

Richards taught at Cambridge University and Harvard University. He died in 1979, on his return home to Cambridge from a teaching trip to China.

  I.A. Richards is a pioneer figure as far as New Criticism is considered. His work are.
1 The Meaning of Meaning- 1923
2 The Practical of Criticism – 1929
3 The Principles of Literary criticism-1924


         To him, language of poetry is purely emotive, in its original primitive state. This language affects feelings. Hence we must avid intuitive and over – literal reading of poems. Words in poetry have an emotive value, and the figurative language used by poets conveys those emotions effectively and forcefully. His approach towards criticism is pragmatic and empirical.
           I.A. Richards by his own work could make literary Criticism factual, Scientific and complete. It no longer remains a matter of the application of set ruler or mere ‘intuition’ or impressions analysis, intertpretation and evatution have exercised considerable influence on the New Critics everywhere.


Mining of figurative language:-

Figurative language is language that uses words or expressions with a meaning that is different from the literal interpretation. When a writer uses literal language, he or she is simply stating the facts as they are. Figurative language, in comparison, uses exaggerations or alterations to make a particular linguistic point.
Figurative language is very common in poetry, but is also used in prose and nonfiction writing.
There are many different types of figurative language, covering the use of a specific type of word or word meaning:
Ø Metaphor: A metaphor is a comparison made between things which are essentially not alike. One example of a metaphor would be to say, “Nobody invites Edward to parties because he is a wet blanket.”
Ø Simile: A simile is a direct comparison and often uses the words like or as. One example of a simile would be to say, “Jamie runs as fast as the wind.”
Ø Personification: When something that is not human is given human-like qualities, this is known as personification. An example of personification would be to say, “The leaves danced in the wind on the cold October afternoon.”
Ø Hyperbole: Exaggerating, often in a humorous way, to make a point is known as hyperbole. One example of hyperbole would be to say, “My eyes widened at the sight of the mile-high sundaes we were having for dessert.”
Ø Symbolism: Symbolism occurs when something that has meaning in itself is used to represent something entirely different. One example of symbolism would be to use an image of the American flag to represent patriotism.

I.A.Richard’s Figurative language:-
I.A.Richards gave a lot of important “to words”.
According to him words carry four kinds of mining’s.
Ø Sense: By sense it meant something that is communicated by the plain literal meanings of the words.
Ø Feeling: Refers to emotions, emotional attitudes, desire, will, pleasure, UN pleasure and the rest. Words express feelings.
Ø Tone: Tone here means the writer’s attitude towards his audience. The writer chooses his words and arranges them keeping in mind the taste of his readers. Feeling is only state of mind.
Ø Intention: Intention is author’s conscious or unconscious aim. It is the effect that one tries to produce. Also intention controls the emphasis, shapes the arrangement or draws attention to something of importance. Richards says that

According to him words in poetry have an imtive value.and the figurative language used by poets convey those emotions effectively and forcefully his appeoch towards critisicm is pragmatic and empilical.by his own work he could make literary criticism scientific, and complit.
His factual and scientific method of critical analysis, inerpritations, and evoluation has considerable influence on the new critics everywere.
Source of Misunderstanding in Poetry:
According to I.A.Richards there are four sources of misunderstanding of poetry. It is difficult to diagnose with accuracy and definiteness, the source of some particular mistake or misunderstanding. First, there might be a misunderstanding of the sense of poetry. It arises from inattention, or sheer, cardessness. I.A.Richards warns readers- In most poetry the sense is as important as anything  else; it is quite as a subtle, and as dependent on the syntax, as in prose, it is the poet’s chief instrument to other aims when it is not itself his aim. His control of thoughts is ordinarily his chief means to the control of our feelings, and in the immense majority of instances we miss nearly everything of value if we misread his sense.


An over literal-reading is as great a source of misunderstanding in poetry as careless, ‘intuitive’ reading. Careless, intuitive reading and prosaic “over-literal” reading are the simple-grades, the justing rocks. Defective scholarship is a third source of misunderstanding in poetry. The reader may fail to understand the sense of the poet, because he is ignorant of poet’s sense. A far more serious cause of misunderstanding is the failure to realize that the poetic use of words is different from their use in prose. Complaints may rest upon an assumption about language that can be fatal to poetry. Literary is one serious obstacle in the way of a right understanding of the poetic words. According to Richards-‘poetry is different from prose and needs a different attitude for right understanding.’


FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE:
A Simile is a FIGURE OF THOUGHT:-

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhHunqtdaFKBwUjs4w0XJxWc9yNNP0uwRWBFqLgoM7wYEw2SctcTh63Si7h4ZSiIEIuFC0fXX6ce9POWC2xW3tARXzFeCBtitW2KekER_eOfVdoH1-aM9ozEQtkSAtsdnmExHbE1fEdrksX/s400/aa7ab34f125ed611c0192185f0b7552f.jpg

A simile is a figure of thought in which one kind of thing is compared to a markedly different object, concept, or experience; the comparison is made explicit by the word “like” or “as”; “jen’s room is like a pig sty.” The simile can be carried further and specify some feature of the comparison: “jen’s room is as dirty as a sty.” In either case, the effect is that the subject and the analogy are pictured in quick sequence, side by side.
Similes occur in both poetry and prose, and they may be short and simple or long and extended. They provide an important indication of an author or speaker’s TONE; that is implied attitude towards the subject. As with a METAPHORE, the means is to use a comparison that reflects some key quality of the literal subject. For, use a comparison that reflects some key quality of the literal subject. For example, the tone of simile may be exalted, as in Robert Burns’ lyrical tribute: “O, May luve’s like a red, red rose.” Here, the image evoked is of a fresh, vibrant, and lovely object of adoration.

 The Value of Figurative Language:
The use of figurative language can create problems. It is difficult to turn poetry into logical respectable prose. Only through accuracy and precision is combined with recognition of the liberties which are proper for a poet, and the power and value of figurative language.
The use of figurative language can create problems. It is difficult to turn poetry into logical respectable prose. Only through accuracy and precision is combined with a recognition of the liberties is combined with a recognition of the liberties which are proper for a poet, and precision is combined with a recognition  of the liberties which are a recognition of the liberties which are proper for a poet, and the power and value of figurative language.
Conclusion:
          In very simple words and language we can describe figurative language as close study of words and only text without any background, history, writer, but just as an individual text and interpret in our own understanding. It can lead a reader to misunderstanding too but then even it can never be wrong because not a single thing, single interpretation in poetry can be wrong because every poetry has numbers of interpretations because a work of art has numbers of interpretations. Interpretations are based on mind, mentality, background, brought up, and society of reader. It may be leads reader to misreading of poetry but then even can be originality of literary work without any prejudices. It is not justly based on assumptions but it s based on words, emotions, intention and scientific methods. 

 I.A.Richards says:-
 “The chemist must not require that the poet writes like a chemist, not the moralist, not the man of affairs, nor the logician, nor the professor, that he writes as they would. The whole trouble of literalism is that the readers forget that the aim of the poems comes first and is the sole justification of its means. We may quarrel, frequently we must, with aim of the poem, but we have first to ascertain what it is. We cannot legitimately judge its means by external standards which may have no relevance to its success in doing what it set out to do.”

Bibliography

http://pritibagohil1416.blogspot.in/2015/02/iarichards-view-on-language-of-poetry.html

Thinking activity: ELT & ICT

1) Why is it necessary to use Technology in Education?  Change is the rule of nature, if you don't change or update yours...