Tuesday, 4 December 2018

assignment paper 11

click here to evaluate my assignment.


comparison between a tempest and the tempest

Name:- Nirali dungrani
Roll no: - 24
Enrolment no:- 2069108420180012
Paper: -11 postcolonial literature
Topic: - comparison between a tempest and the tempest
Submitted to: - Department of English MKB uni.






Introduction
Aime Fernand David Cesaire
(26 June 1913 – 17 April 2008) was a Francophone and French poet, author and politician from Martinique. He was "one of the founders of the nĂ©gritude movement in Francophone literature". His works included Une TempĂȘte, a response to Shakespeare's play The Tempest, and Discours sure le colonialism (Discourse on Colonialism), an essay describing the strife between the colonizers and the colonized. His works have been translated into many languages.
William Shakespeare


Image result for william shakespeare

(26 April 1564 – 23 April 1616) was an English poet, playwright and actor, widely regarded as both the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist. He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon". His extant works, including collaborations, consist of approximately 39 plays, 154 sonnets, two long narrative poems, and a few other verses, some of uncertain authorship. His plays have been translated into every major living language and are performed more often than those of any other playwright.

A Tempest
A Tempest by Aime Cesaire was originally published in 1969 in French by Editions du Seuil in Paris. Cesaire, a recognized poet, essayist, playwright, and politician, was born in Martinique in 1913 and, until his death in 2008, had been instrumental in voicing post-colonial concerns. In the 1930s, he, along with Leopold Senghor and Leon Gontian Damas, developed the negritudemovement which endeavored to question French colonial rule and restore the cultural identity of blacks in the African diaspora. A Tempest is the third play in a trilogy aimed at advancing the tenets of the negritude movement. In 1985, the play was translated into English by Richard Miller and had its American premiere in 1991 at the Ubu Repertory Theater in New York after having been performed in France, the Middle East, Africa, and the West Indies.
  A Tempest focuses on the trouble of Ariel and Caliban—the never-ending quest to gain freedom from Prospero and his rule over the island. Ariel, dutiful to Prospero, follows all orders given by him and sincerely believes that Prospero will honor his promise of emancipation. Caliban, on the other hand, slights Prospero at every opportunity: upon entering the first act, Caliban greets Prospero by saying “Uhuru!”, the Swahili word for freedom.
A Tempest is a postcolonial revision of William Shakespeare’s The Tempest and draws heavily on the original play—the cast of characters is, for the most part, the same, and the foundation of the plot follows the same basic premise. Prospero has been exiled and lives on a secluded island, and he drums up a violent storm to drive his daughter’s ship ashore. The island, however, is somewhere in the Caribbean, Ariel is a mulatto slave rather than a sprite, and Caliban is a black slave. A Tempest focuses on the plight of Ariel and Caliban—the never-ending quest to gain freedom from Prospero and his rule over the island. Ariel, dutiful to Prospero, follows all orders given to him and sincerely believes that Prospero will honor his promise of emancipation. Caliban, on the other hand, slights Prospero at every opportunity: upon entering the first act, Caliban greets Prospero by saying “Uhuru!”, the Swahili word for “freedom.” Prospero complains that Caliban often speaks in his native language which Prospero has forbidden. This prompts Caliban to attempt to claim birthrights to the island, angering Prospero who threatens to whip Caliban. During their argument, Caliban tells Prospero that he no longer wants to be called Caliban, “Call me X. That would be best. Like a man without a name. Or, to be more precise, a man whose name has been stolen.” The allusion to Malcolm X cements the aura of cultural reclamation that serves as the foundational element of A Tempest. Cesaire has also included the character Eshu who in the play is cast as a black devil-god. Calling on the Yoruba mythological traditions of West Africa, Eshu assumes the archetypal role of the trickster and thwarts Prospero’s power and authority during assemblies. Near the end of the play, Prospero sends all the lieutenants off the island to procure a place in Naples for his daughter Miranda and her husband Ferdinand. When the fleet begs him to leave, Prospero refuses and claims that the island cannot stand without him; in the end, only he and Caliban remain. As Prospero continues to assert his hold on the island, Caliban’s freedom song can be heard in the background. Thus, Cesaire leaves his audience to consider the lasting effects of colonialism.
The Tempest
Written between 1610 and 1611, The Tempest is William Shakespeare’s final play. (OK. If you're nitpicky, it's the last play he wrote entirely by himself.) In it, Shakespeare portrays an aging magician who has been living in exile with his young daughter on a remote island for the past twelve years. Over the course of a single day, Prospero uses his magic to whip up a tempest to shipwreck the men responsible for his banishment. He then proceeds to dazzle and dismay the survivors (and the audience) with his art as he orchestrates his triumphant return home where he plans to retire in peace.
 The story draws heavily on the tradition of remote, and it was influenced by tragicomedy. Character of Prospero represent art through his magic, he is representation of Shakespeare. The play portrays Prospero as a rational and character of Sycorax, her magic is frequently described as destructive and terrible.

For a lot of audiences and literary scholars, Prospero seems like a stand-in in for Shakespeare, who spent a lifetime dazzling audiences before retiring in 1611, shortly after The Tempest was completed. Not only is the play chock-full of self conscious references to the workings of the theater, its epilogue seems to be a final and fond farewell to the stage. When Prospero (after giving up the art of magic he's spent a lifetime perfecting) appears alone before the audience he confesses, "Now my charms are all o'erthrown, / And what strength I have's mine own," we can't help but wonder of Shakespeare is speaking through this character here.
Regardless of whether or not our boy Shakespeare intended for us to understand the epilogue as a big adios to his own art, the play does seem to be a nice capstone to a brilliant career because The Tempest revisits some of the most important issues and themes to have emerged from Shakespeare's previous plays. Literary scholar Stephen Greenblatt, who calls the play an "echo-chamber of Shakespearean motifs," points out that The Tempestresonates "with issues that haunted Shakespeare's imagination throughout his career." Of course, you'll be wanting some examples, so be sure to check out “Allusion” and “Themes”.
How can we compare Shakespeare’s The Tempest with A Tempest?


 There is not much difference between Shakespeare’s The Tempest and Aime Cesaire’s   A Tempest. But ‘A Tempest’ presents colonial aspect and mentality of master-slave relationship. Here in the play Caliban and Ariel portrays as a different way. Prospero is also a good example of the role power plays in the story. Character of Stephano is another example of power in the play. Miranda plays very innocent role in the play and she is only one character who presents woman role in the island. 

Prospero asked question to Caliban.

Prospero: What would you be without me?
Caliban: Without you? I’d be the king, that’s what I’d be, the king of the Island. (Original text A Tempest, Page no. 12)

  So, in this question we can find that how Prospero overpower and make his self superior to Caliban. But Caliban also very talkative and give appropriate answers to the questions of Prospero and can’t bear him. Here, Aime Cesaire gives voice to Caliban, the subaltern identity of The Tempest. Caliban tells Prospero that “I am not interested in peace; I am interested in free will.” Here Caliban presented as free individualistic person and rebel.

Conclusion:

    In short, A Tempest presents colonial angle towards black identity or mulatto. The Tempest more focused on the shipwrecked, magic, revenge and happy marriage of Miranda and A Tempest more concentrate on attitude of Negro, status of their mind and relationship of master-slave. Idea of rebel, Idea of resistance shown by Aime Cesaire in the play through the character of Caliban. Caliban is a speaking subaltern and subjugated for himself, not killing Prospero. Colonialism gives the name to the person that’s why identity crisis happens in the play. Here we can give the example of Robinson Crusoe that how he gives name to the Friday and teaches all the things.




(prakruti) (velari) (Wikipedia)

Works Cited

prakruti, bhatt. Bhatt Prakruti's Assignments. 3 11 2018. 30 october 2013 <http://prakrutibhatt192013.blogspot.com/2013/10/comparison-of-shakespeares-tempest-and.html>.
velari, ranjan. Ranjan Velari's assignments. 3 11 2018. 17 october 2015 <http://ranjanvelari201416.blogspot.com/2015/10/comparison-of-shakespeares-tempest-and.html>.
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 3 11 2018. 24 october 2018 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aim%C3%A9_C%C3%A9saire>.



  

assignment paper 10

click here to evaluate my assignment.




Scarlet letter as the story of sin, crime, and punishment


Name:- Nirali dungrani
Roll no: - 24
Enrolment no:- 2069108420180012
Paper: -10 American literature
Topic: - Scarlet letter as the story of sin, crime, and punishment
Submitted to: - Department of English MKB uni.







Introduction
About author
Nathaniel Hawthorne, (born July 4, 1804, Salem, Mass., U.S.—died May 19, 1864, Plymouth, N.H.), American novelist and short-story writer who was a master of the allegorical and symbolic tale. One of the greatest fiction writers in American literature, he is best known for The Scarlet Letter (1850) and The House of the Seven Gables.

About novel
Image result for scarlet letter

The Scarlet Letter Introduction The Scarlet Letter is a classic tale of sin, punishment, and revenge. It was written in 1850 by the famous American author Nathaniel Hawthorne. It documents the lives of three tragic characters, each of whom suffer greatly because of his or her sins.
The novel is set in a 17th-century village in Puritan New England. The main character is Hester Prynne, a young woman who has borne a child out of wedlock. Hester believes herself a widow, but her husband, Roger Chilling worth, returns to New England very much alive and conceals his identity. He finds his wife forced to wear the scarlet letter A on her dress as punishment for her adultery. Chilling worth becomes obsessed with finding the identity of his wife’s former lover. When he learns that the father of Hester’s child is Arthur Dimmesdale, a saintly young minister who is the leader of those exhorting her to name the child’s father, Chilling worth proceeds to torment the guilt-stricken young man.
In the end Chillingworth is morally degraded by his monomaniacal pursuit of revenge; Dimmesdale is broken by his own sense of guilt, and he publicly confesses his adultery before dying in Hester’s arms. Only Hester can face the future bravely as she prepares to begin a new life with her daughter, Pearl, in Europe.

The Scarlet Letter as a Story of Crime and Punishment

The Scarlet Letter is essentially a story of crime, sin and punishment. It tells of the ignominy or humiliation of a woman who has broken scriptural and statutory law in a community dedicated to the maintenance of the authority of the law. The magistrates and ministers named are historical figures and the narrator acts the part of a historian, setting the account of her punishment in the context of the history of New England.

Richard Bellingham, for example, is an important figure in this story of Puritan justice, for he is said to be the chief magistrate when Hester Prynne is sentenced to wear her badge of shame.
In wearing the letter, Hester Prynne loses her individuality and becomes “the general symbol at which the preacher and moralist might point, and in which they might vivify and embody their images of woman’s frailty and sinful passion”. Hester is the “text of the discourse” whenever there is a minister present to read the letter. It is, however, later that “many people refused to interpret the scarlet A by its original signification. They said that it meant Able so strong was Hester Prynne, with a woman’s strength. The people who refuse to read the letter as the judges intended to do so because they respond to Hester as a woman rather than as  a type, as a sign, or as a text. In thus misreading the letter they are subverting the system of law based on the belief that the authority of the lawmaker is “of God”. The people of Boston do so spontaneously and unselfconsciously, for they act as the narrator tells us, from the heart. So, too does Arthur Dimmesdale when he allows the suppressed wildness in his nature to speak out and calls Hester his “better angel.”
But the strategy of subversion is employed by Hawthorne after Hester had been branded as a sinner according to the judgments of the Puritan patriarchies. To their mind, her guilt is total and unquestionable and that their morality is the absolute morality. Her sin is unredeemable according to the Puritan ethic. Hester has sinned against the seventh Commandment of God “Neither shall thou commit adultery” – and lost His favour for ever. She can be made to do penance by making her wear of her guilt. Hester’s punishment is double. Not only does she have to wear the embroidered letter on her bosom but Pearl’s presence also keeps reminding her of her sin. The Puritan society asserts its authority over the individual by forcing Hester to accept her punishment. She can, of course, avoid to escaping from the settlement. But, deep down a Puritan herself, Hester chooses to stay back. She however, tries to justify her stance by telling Dimmesdale in the forest, what we did had a consecration of its own. We felt it so: we said so to each other.
Hester is a social outcast in the community. Children follow her and shout at her. Strangers gaze at the scarlet letter on her bosom and make no secret of their contempt for her. Her numerous acts of charity as a Sister for Mercy do not secure her the society’s pardon. But Hester is not embittered by the experience.
The reverse is the case with Arthur Dimmesdale. He is Hester’s partner-in-sin and his punishment comes purely from within. He is all the time haunted by his sense of guilt. The fact of concealment serves only to intensify his misery. He undergoes various kind of penance, including vigils, fasts and self-flagellation. As he tells Hester in the forest, it is all penance and no penitence. He even mounts the scaffolds on the dark night of the vigil as an act of expiation. He ultimately manages to carry out the resolve after his  Election Day sermon and unburdens his heart to the crowd. Therein lies his deliverance.
But no such deliverance awaits Hester. She leaves the settlement with Pearl after the deaths of Dimmesdale and Chillingworth, but returns to her solitary cottage on the outskirts of the settlement after a few year of continue serving the people. She has, in fact, triumphed over the punishment meted out to her through her vocation (needle work) and her service to the people and also through her implicit acceptance of the punishment. Yet a space is kept between her grave and that of Dimmesdale after her death, signifying that society might have forgiven them, but their ultimate redemption lies in the hands of God. The Puritan ethic is perfectly carried out in The Scarlet Letter even though the narrative is marked by ambiguity at several points.
Dimmesdale is a greater sinner than Hester. First he goes against the purity of his profession; secondly he tries to conceal his crime from the public. He adds hypocrisy to his sin. His conscience allows him no rest; he gets constant trouble from his soul. As for him, the burden of his sin gives 
 Chillingworth is also the greatest sinner. He is made to represent Hawthorne’s ideas of the unpardonable sinner. Arthur Dimmesdale tells Hester about Chillingworth in the forest, 

            “May God forgive us both ! we are not, Hester the worst sinner in the world. There is one worse than ever the polluted priest ! that old man’s revenge has been blacken than my sin. He has been violeted in cold blood, the sanctity of a human heart. Thou and I, Hester never did so !"

CONCLUSION:-
                                Thus, from the deeds of all the characters in ‘The Scarlet Letter’, the novel can be seen as Crime committed by them, and the situations they are facing that is like their punishment. The Scarlet Letter is an exemplification of the theme of Crime and Punishment  It is mainly the story of Crime, say sexual crime , and the consequences arising therefrom. The act of adultery is certainly a crime against the individual, be that individual, the wronged wife or a husband  Similarly it is also a crime against society, for it involves that violation of a moral code formulated and honored by that society. Adultery has been branded as immoral in all civilized communities of the world. So we can say that the life Hester lived, Dimmesdale also face inner guilt all these shows it as the novel of Sin Crime and Punishment.

The Scarlet Letter is a tragic story of sin, crime and Punishment which can be learnt by the deeds of all the characters, the crime they committed and the situations they face. The act of adultery is certain a crime against the individual. Same way, it is also a crime against society as it involves the violation of the moral code formulated and honoured by the society. Hawthorne has given the concept of sin and evil which is a puritan heritage. Sin and crime was the constant theme in this novel and the consequences of guilt as primarily psychological in nature. Hester's loveliness is shown by a sense of guilt. The story shows the concept of sin, crime and Punishment through Hester's life and Dimmesdale's inner guilt.

(The Scarlet Letter Essay) (McDonald) (Dave) (The Scarlet Letter as a Story of Crime and Punishment) (avni)

Works Cited

2018. <https://www.bachelorandmaster.com/britishandamericanfiction/story-of-crime-and-punishment.html#.W91BtNIzbIW>.
avni, dave. Dave Avani's Assignments. 3 11 2018. 29 october 2013 <http://avanidave031213.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-scarlet-letter-as-story-of-sin.html>.
Dave, Urvi. Assignments. 3 11 2018. 29 october 2015 <http://urvidave2014-16.blogspot.com/2015/10/the-scarlet-letter-as-story-of-sin.html>.
McDonald, Dr. Ronan. The Scarlet Letter. <https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Scarlet-Letter-novel-by-Hawthorne>.
The Scarlet Letter as a Story of Crime and Punishment. 3 11 2018. <https://www.bachelorandmaster.com/britishandamericanfiction/story-of-crime-and-punishment.html#.W91BtNIzbIW>.
The Scarlet Letter Essay. <https://www.bartleby.com/essay/The-Scarlet-Letter-P3CLE6EYVJ>.







































assignment paper 9


click here to evaluate my assignment

2Themes of the Wasteland


Name:- Nirali dungrani
Roll no:- 24
Enrolment no:- 2069108420180012
Paper: - 9 Modernist literature
Topic: - Themes of the Wasteland
Submitted to: - Department of English MKB uni.










Introduction:-



About Author:-
Thomas Stearns Eliot (26 September 1888 – 4 January 1965), was an essayist, publisher, playwright, literary and social critic, and one of the twentieth century's major poets.  Born in St. LouisMissouri, in the United States, to a prominent Boston Brahmin family, he moved to England in 1914 at the age of 25, settling, working, and marrying there. He became a British subject in 1927 at the age of 39, renouncing his American passport.
Poem:-



The Waste Land is a long poem by T. S. Eliot widely regarded as one of the most important poems of the 20th century and a central work of modernist poetry. Published in 1922, the 434-line.
·         Part I opens with the famous line, "April is the cruellest month." The speaker, Marie, is a young woman who bears witness to the physical and emotional devastation caused by the war.
·         Parts II and III describe the inside of a wealthy woman's bedroom and the garbage-filled waters of the Thames, respectively. Part IV eulogizes a drowned man named Phlebas.
·         In the fifth and final part of the poem, the speaker "translates" the thunderclaps cracking over an Indian jungle. The poem ends with the repetition of the Sanskrit word for peace: "Shantih shantih shantih."

The poem's structure is divided into five sections. The first section, "The Burial of the Dead," introduces the diverse themes of disillusionment and despair. The second, "A Game of Chess," employs vignettes of several characters alternating narrations that address those themes experientially. "The Fire Sermon," the third section, offers a philosophical meditation in relation to the imagery of death and views of self-denial in juxtaposition influenced by Augustine of Hippo and eastern religions. After a fourth section, "Death by Water," which includes a brief lyrical petition, the culminating fifth section, "What the Thunder Said," concludes with an image of judgment.
Themes:-
1)           The seasons
2)           Sex
3)           Memory and the past
4)           Water
5)           Rebirth
6)           Religion
7)           History
8)           Lust
9)           Isolation
10)   Appearances

The Seasons

 

The Waste Land opens with an invocation of April, the cruellest month. That spring be depicted as cruel is a curious choice on Eliot’s part, but as a paradox it informs the rest of the poem to a great degree. What brings life brings also death; the seasons fluctuate, spinning from one state to another, but, like history, they maintain some sort of stasis; not everything changes. In the end, Eliot’s “waste land” is almost season less: devoid of rain, of propagation, of real change. The world hangs in a perpetual limbo, waiting the dawn of a new season.

SEX


In "The Waste Land," the status of sex is pretty much a measuring stick for how morally demolished society is. On several occasions, when it comes time for Eliot to show how truly low we've all fallen, he points toward sex—and not just sex, but the separation of sex from love. There's no getting around it; pop culture is totally obsessed with sex, and it tries to throw sex in our faces as much as it can. For Eliot, sex once had the potential to be a beautiful thing. But in modern times, this beauty has been completely stripped of its significance, mostly because the act of sex no longer has anything to do with love. Call Eliot a little old-fashioned, but the guy's observations on sex pretty much still hold true for much of pop culture today.

MEMORY AND THE PAST


There's just no getting away from the past in "The Waste Land," but Eliot's biggest criticism of modern society is that it has gotten too far away from the past. Throughout this poem, you encounter a lot of personal memories; but for Eliot, these aren't nearly as important as the "cultural memory" he's trying to preserve in this poem.

Water

 "The Waste Land" lacks water water promises rebirth. At the same time, however, water can bring about death. Eliot sees the card of the drowned Phoenician sailor and later titles the fourth section of his poem after Madame Sosostris‟ mandate that he fear “death by water.” When the rain finally arrives at the close of the poem, it does suggest the cleansing of sins, the washing away of misdeeds, and the start of a new future; however, with it comes thunder, and therefore perhaps lightning. The latter may portend fire; thus, “The Fire Sermon” and “What the Thunder Said” are not so far removed in imagery, linked by the potentially harmful forces of nature.
Rebirth

The Christ images in the poem, along with the many other religious metaphors, posit rebirth and resurrection as central themes. The Waste Land lies fallow and the Fisher King is impotent; what is needed is a new beginning. Water, for one, can bring about that rebirth, but it can also destroy. What the poet must finally turn to is Heaven, in the climactic exchange with the skies: “Datta. Dayadhvam. Damyata.” Eliot’s vision is essentially of a world that is neither dying nor living; to break the spell, a profound change, perhaps an ineffable one, is required. Hence the prevalence of Grail imagery in the poem; that holy chalice can restore life and wipe the slate clean; likewise, Eliot refers frequently to baptisms and to rivers – both “life-givers,” in either spiritual or physical ways.

RELIGION


For Eliot, one of the single greatest causes of Western civilization becoming "The Waste Land" is the fact that religion doesn't really have the influence it once did. In the old days, people didn't have to worry so much about questions like "Why am I here?" or "What's the meaning of life," because religion already had answers for these questions. In the modern world though, Eliot has seen a decline in the power of religion, and one of the side effects of this decline is that more and more people are feeling like they're in a funk or suffering from a full-blown spiritual crisis.

History

 

History, Eliot suggests, is a repeating cycle. When he calls to Stetson, the Punic War stands in for World War I; this substitution is crucial because it is shocking. At the time Eliot wrote "The Waste Land," the First World War was definitively a first - the "Great War" for those who had witnessed it. There had been none to compare with it in history. The predominant sensibility was one of profound change; the world had been turned upside down and now, with the rapid progress of technology, the movements of societies, and the radical upheavals in the arts, sciences, and philosophy, the history of mankind had reached a turning point.


Lust

Perhaps the most famous episode in "The Waste Land" involves a female typist’s liaison with a carbuncula man. Eliot depicts the scene as something akin to a rape. This chance sexual encounter carries with it mythological baggage – the violated Philomela, the blind Tiresias who lived for a time as a woman. Sexuality runs through "The Waste Land," taking center stage as a cause of calamity in “The Fire Sermon.” Nonetheless, Eliot defends a moment’s surrender as a part of existence in “What the Thunder Said.” Lust may be a sin, and sex may be too easy and too rampant in Eliot’s London, but action is still preferable to inaction. What is needed is sex that produces life, that rejuvenates, that restores sex, in other words, and that is not sterile.
Isolation

Question: Hey Eliot, what's so wrong with the modern world?
Eliot's answer: Everyone is way too selfish.
Question: So what?
Eliot's answer: Well, haven't you ever wondered why you're so lonely? That's why.
In "The Waste Land," the great despair of modern existence doesn't just come from a sense of meaninglessness, but from a very deep loneliness. This loneliness, in turn, is something Eliot thinks we create for ourselves by constantly pursuing our own selfish interests. It's pretty simple: you can't spend your whole life trying to beat the people around you, then turn around and complain about being lonely. Modern existence, with its emphasis on individualism, is a breeding ground for isolation and loneliness, and the major problem with modern people is that they don't seem to realize that they're responsible for the isolation that's always eating at their souls.

APPEARANCES



Simply put, there are some pretty unattractive characters walking around "The Waste Land." The worst of all might be the two-thousand-year-old Tiresias, with his wrinkled dugs but the pimply-faced young man carbuncular might give the prophet a run for his money in the Ugliest Eliot Character pageant. Eliot might talk a lot about sympathy and compassion, but he's more than willing to draw a direct relationship between moral and physical ugliness when it comes to stuff he doesn't like. Eliot focuses on people's appearances constantly throughout this poem, and always does so to convey his larger ideas about spiritual beauty and ugliness.

Conclusion:-
                  
           There are many themes. They are very helpful to understand the whole poem very easily. There are some important aspects remain in themes so themes can be important to study any other texts. 


(From Wikipedia) (PREMIUM) (T.S. ELIOT – THE WASTE LAND) (The Waste Land Summary)

Works Cited

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. the waste land . 13 march 2002. 20 september 2018 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Waste_Land>.
PREMIUM, SHMOOP. www.shmoop.com. <https://www.shmoop.com/the-waste-land/memory-past-theme.html>.
T.S. ELIOT – THE WASTE LAND. <file:///C:/Users/hp/Downloads/33._T.S._Eliot___The_Waste_Land%20(2).pdf>.
The Waste Land Summary. <https://www.enotes.com/topics/waste-land>.
























































































presentation paper 12

click here to evaluate my presentation.


presentation paper 11

Thinking activity: ELT & ICT

1) Why is it necessary to use Technology in Education?  Change is the rule of nature, if you don't change or update yours...